Even with an anemic economic recovery, as of today, President Barack Obama has a better chance of winning reelection that he did a couple of months ago. Under his leadership, the national debt has skyrocketed and America’s credit rating has been downgraded. We had the bank bailout in 2009, $900 billion stimulus package and a signature healthcare legislation, but the unemployment rate is still over 8%. Middle-class families continue to see their wages dissipate, and over 46 million Americans are now living below the poverty line. According to the latest Census Bureau report, the U.S poverty rate has risen 15%, the highest since 1993. With all of that in mind, President Obama is still in relatively good shape thanks in part to the Republican presidential candidates. An election that Republicans hope will be a referendum on President Obama’s economic policies and leadership is slowly turning into a debate about fairness and equality. The attacks by Gov. Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich on Gov. Romney’s business practices at Bain capital was a political blessing for President Obama who will much rather make the election a choice between who’s on the side of the middle-class and who isn’t. This is a fight he can win. Mitt Romney’s awkward $10,000 bet in a debate, and his 15% tax problem fits into President Obama's fairness narrative. In addition, Newt Gingrich’s work with Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac which Gov. Romney described as “influence peddling” also plays into the hands of a president that wants to frame the election around fairness and equality. In his State of the Union, he previewed what will be some of his arguments in the campaign.
It was a politically astute speech. He spoke like a populist. His tone was filled with passion and defiance, qualities that his liberal base will appreciate. “With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow,” he said. He also strategically positioned himself as a “fighter” for the middle-class. He talked about restoring manufacturing jobs and fairness. “It's not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they're heavily subsidized…I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China… A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy…We can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share.” You get the point. He wants to frame the choice in the election around a vision of equality and fairness. This argument could play well with independent voters.
On substance however, a lot of his proposals were too small, and too insufficient for the moment. A small business tax-cut here, and some investments there won’t solve the country’s biggest problems. Entitlement programs need reform. The tax code needs to be simplified. We need more investment in infrastructure. And more than ever, Washington has to get more serious about curtailing federal spending and passing a serious long-term debt plan (Simpson-Bowles comes to mind). President Obama won’t win reelection without speaking earnestly about these issues. Nevertheless, if anybody can pull off reelection in the current political climate and poor economic conditions, it will be this president. He is still a skilled campaigner, and the Republican candidates are making things easier for him.


